Enlightened despotism French Revolution
The philosophes, in France and elsewhere, were rarely happy to talk about these ideas among themselves. These were in the general public arena agitating for change.
This brought for an important political debate, particularly in France. In France the space between your claims from the condition and it is feeble forces was large. French progressive thinkers were challenged in ways their British alternatives weren't. And also the intense debate in Paris and elsewhere was very influential throughout continental Europe, as foreign intellectuals faced similar otherwise worse problems of backwardness in their own individual nations.
All of the philosophes were built with a roughly similar proper diagnosis of the political and social problems they faced in France all shared in popularity of progressive England. However when it found creating a free society in your own home, there have been arguments.
One prominent and early philosophe, Montesquieu, for example, saw a too-strong monarchy as the reason for France's problems.
His Spirit from the Laws and regulations , (1730s), contended that the good metabolic rate should be a well-balanced one: not one body or institution could rule well. It had been the total amount that Montesquieu thought he saw in England, and that was missing in France, he envied and marketed. Later, affected the American constitution's authors.
It's interesting that the majority of the philosophes could not agree strongly with Montesquieu. Montesquieu, who had been themself part of the nobility from the robe, the families that were ennobled by holding office, may think that it might be good to achieve the aristocracy have a greater role within the government. Other philosophes saw the rights of the group like a large area of the problem, and by no means an answer. It had been the dwelling of privilege itself that needed to be taken apart.
How to get this done? The apparent answer was reform previously mentioned. France needed a powerful legislator, a complete king, who could introduce and enforce the reforms so frantically needed.